Pages

Thursday, May 16, 2013

Google+ Redesigned

Samantha Murphy has the story at Mashable in Google+ Redesign Looks a Lot Like Facebook, Pinterest

Monday, April 22, 2013

God’s Own Official Guide to Locating Everything (GOOGLE)

This one at Mattbradney's Blog really makes you smile, if you appreciate the humor!

God’s Own Official Guide to Locating Everything (GOOGLE)

Friday, September 14, 2012

Browser Complaints and More: Not Provided Keywords As Pitfalls in Google Analytics Because of Encrypted Searches

Paul North has the scoop on data analysis and search reporting and
the impact of "not provided" keywords because of encrypted searches
(e.g. as reported in The Register, Firefox 14 in July introduced encrypted HTTPS Google search as the default).

See the SEO Blog in
3 Google Analytics Traps Caused By (Not Provided) Keyword Data.

One of the major problems in Mozilla Firefox in its recent editions, by the way, is the programmers not giving USERS the OPTION to select what they want but rather pushing their ideas forcibly on an often misinformed or uninformed public. It is a strategy that reminds of parents telling their children they know what is best for them, regardless of the actual results, and is a philosophy destined to slowly erode the Firefox user base.

We are quite prepared for an alternative search engine to Firefox that puts the USERS first, not the programmers.

Obviously, we have no use for Google Chrome or Internet Explorer, which permit virtually no customization and  are made for infrequent Internet users who have little conception of what they are doing except surfing aimlessly. Similarly, Opera is way behind in permitting USER customization.

I want -- and this is essential -- ANY new page to be opened in a new tab. The failure of browsers to do this often means that material in an opened tab -- e.g. an email -- is irretrievably lost if some link or search uses the same tab. That all browser makers have not comprehended this is a mystery.

I want to be able to place my tabs BELOW all the rest of the stuff at the the top of the screen. I definitely do not want tabs above the menu. I want what I AM DOING and working on to be in the foreground, not what some programmers have done or what some company wants me to see.

I want to be able to install add-ons that give me different colored tabs for each tab and a special marking of the open tab. I want to be able to close tabs at any time EITHER directly at the tab OR by an "close tab" button at the end of the tab bar -- the reason for the latter is that when you are doing research on a given topic and have dozens of pages open about that topic, and then finish that topic, you close tabs fast from the "close tab" button at the right, closing tabs in order right to left until you get to the previous tabs you want to keep.

I want to be able to put ANY and ALL icons of my choice in the command menus, ANYWHERE, as I want them to be and not as the programmers or companies want them to be.

I want a Google toolbar like the old style toolbar I have always used and know how to operate. The discontinuance of this toolbar is the main reason for me to switch from Firefox to another browser.

I want to be able to put toolbars where I want them, not in some predetermined order.

I want to select my own background for the menus, or employ user-made skins.

Themes offered by browser makers should not only offer -- as many currently do -- themes that have the intellectual level of 10-year olds, but some attempt should be made to offer design offerings that reach toward an adult audience.


Tuesday, April 17, 2012

USPTO Grants Apple Patent for Look and Feel of Graphic Interface of iTunes Store: Internet Middle Earth is Under Siege

 
"Ah yes", mused the monopolist inventor, "if only I could patent 'looking and feeling'. Then I would be REALLY rich and I would control everything. After all, my grandfather owned "several entire villages". Why not the world?

"Forget it!", thundered a mighty voice from the heavens, "It was I who invented 'looking and feeling' millennia ago. The world belongs to ME."

And then a thunderbolt issued from the sky, striking the inventor in the chest, inflicting a mighty wound, but not killing him. As in the Book of Job, there was still time for repentance from Satan's unbounded greed. It was the year 2004, the same year as the patent filing for the just now issued patent 8,161,411.

No repentance was made. Quite the contrary, the monopolist inventor in 2011 threatened total destruction of the "Androids" and launched a thermonuclear war against his enemies. If the world were to be destroyed, what did he care.

Enough was enough, and so, in 2012, "The Great Inventor" in the heavens took him.

But wait, over the hill, over the horizon, there suddenly appeared a lifeless vanguard of a force in Sybarian armor following a black-cloaked leader of the once Magna Graecia. Onward Sybarian soldiers!

The leader "Capo" was flanked by riders carrying the flag of ancient Sybaris, land of pleasure and luxury for the chosen few. It was an army of ten thousand mounted on Sybarian Tigers [sic, actually Dragons of Sybaris, for "Sybaris was a drakaina of Greek mythology ... dwelling on Mount Kriphis ... who terrorized the countryside of Delphi, devouring livestock and people"].

The Sybarian "warriors of dragon fire" brandished their fearsome and nigh invincible weapons, the patent rubber stamps, against which no mortal weapon was known, except reason, as rare as the honest man of Diogenes.

Internet Middle Earth was under siege.

Men shivered and women trembled, hiding their children. Dogs barked and cats wailed.

Was it to be their last free song?

ITunetknow (TM).

On the shields of the forces of evil was a serpent coiled around an apple.

It was the USPTO, clandestinely known to the intelligentsia as the United Sybarian Phantom Tiger Overlords or "Patentosh" (TM) for short.

The battle for "Internet Middle Earth" had begun in earnest.

Please note concerning the story above: Any resemblance to real persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental. Links go to sources which may have served as inspiration for what is, of course, a purely fictional story.

__________


Don Reisinger has the real life story at CNET News in

Apple wins patent for iTunes Store user interface.

We have been studying the patent claims as well as the applicable user interface for obvious signs of any "inventions" or "discoveries" that are not obvious to anyone versed in the state of the art of the Internet and the World Wide Web and we have found....nothing.

NOTHING.

To the skilled eye, it appears that online users are being offered music products according to millennium-unchanged banal merchant methods combining images and text that have nothing to do with innovation or discovery, but only the ultimate end of the collection of money.

Patenting a graphic interface that has obvious and essentially generic combinations of graphics and text on the screen is ... shall we say ... absurd.

Whatever the USPTO is patenting here as non-obvious is a mystery to anyone who has grown up in the digital era. All website interfaces are combinations of the same essential features, minimally altered by countless variables. If the Apple interface can be patented, then EVERY graphic interface can arguably be patented. So, unless this crazy path is changed, every commercial website owner should start getting their website patent interface application ready. And we mean that seriously.

If ever reason should return to this field, on the other hand, we would suggest that it should be made a requirement of ALL PATENT APPLICATIONS that the patent applicant specifically identify in the claims of his or her alleged invention what is NOT OBVIOUS to anyone versed in the state of the art and why it is not obvious.

Take a look at the iTunes screen shot at CNET News and pray tell what is non-obvious there and what "in God's name" has been invented other than another example of Apple greed and more patent incompetence at the USPTO.

As far as one can tell there are two worlds at work in patents:
  1. The real world, and
  2. The world as the USPTO sees it.
As long as the law favors absurd patents like this granted by the USPTO, we will have patent chaos and increasing and inexcusable infringements of USER and DEVELOPER FREEDOM. And we are for FREEDOM, and against TYRANNY.

Read the previous post at LawPundit where Sergey Brin of Google points out the increasing restriction of net freedom by companies such as Facebook and Apple. Such restriction is enabled by numerous government agencies that seemingly have no clue about what they are doing, and the USPTO is chief among these.

__________

"Middle Earth is being devoured by Sybarian dragons."

Sergey Brin of Google Sees Internet Freedom Threatened by Facebook and Apple

Dan Farber of CNET News has the story at

Google's Sergey Brin: Facebook and Apple a threat to Internet freedom

After you read that, see the next posting for confirmation that Brin is absolutely right.

Google Gets G-mail German Trademark after Battle


Karin Matussek at Bloomberg BusinessWeek News reports that Google Gets German Trademark Rights for G-mail, Ends Battle


Hat tip to GigaLaw.

Crossposted from LawPundit.

Sunday, April 15, 2012

Google Art Project Goes Global Beyond Painting to Sculpture Street Art and Photographs: Users Can Creat their Own Gallery

The Google Art Project has gone global beyond painting to sculpture, street art, and photographs.

At the Official Google Blog see Going global in search of great art.

Users can create their own gallery:

"An enhanced My Gallery feature lets you select any of the 30,000 artworks—along with your favorite details—to build your own personalized gallery. You can add comments to each painting and share the whole collection with friends and family. (It’s an ideal tool for students.)"

Going global in search of great art | Official Google Blog

Going global in search of great art | Official Google Blog: - Sent using Google Toolbar

Douthat X-Rays The Man With the Google Glasses: Is Human Interaction and Communication Improving or Suffering in the Digital Era?


Ross Douthat at the New York Times has an article definitely worth a read in The Man With the Google Glasses.

The human "isolation" that the digital world can produce is unquestioned, but we wonder if Douthat is giving us "a fair and balanced" picture of what is actually happening out there in the real world.

For example, I just received an email this morning from someone who I had not seen or contacted since high school and who found me through Facebook.

In pre-digital days, such a refreshment of old school ties decades later was next to impossible. People moved away and disappeared into the mass of planetary humanity, with little chance of locating such lost contacts later.

In the digital era, finding old friends and classmates is much easier and is not an "isolated" incident by any means. Quite the contrary, in my family alone, I am guessing that dozens of contacts have been re-established in recent years with lost friends, relatives and acquaintances -- all through the Internet. Marvelous.

One must thus ask if Douthat's article might reflect one of the primary ailments of arch conservatism, which is an understandable but nevertheless skewed romantic nostalgia for the past that does not bear up to critical scrutiny.

Just how good were "human contacts" in the days before the digital era? and are they really "worse" today, as Douthat suggests?

As written at by Zoe O’Donoghue in “Friend Me”: The Impacts of Technology on Human Interaction, Running Head: Technology and Human Interaction,
"Certainly, the ways humans are interacting with each other are changing, and this is changing us.... Natalie Pennington maintains that while social networking sites like Facebook are drastically changing the way we interact, this change is not necessarily a bad thing.... She asserts, "You can learn a lot more about a person from their Facebook profile than the questionnaire they filled out to get a dorm room" (Pennington, 2008 ["Will You Be My Friend: Facebook as a Model for the Evolution of the Social Penetration Theory" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the NCA 94th Annual Convention, TBA, San Diego, CA, Nov 20, 2008.])." [Link added by LawPundit]
When this writer looks back, for example, on high school and college days, just how well THEN did we KNOW the people that we were interacting and communicating with? The answer in many cases is, not very well! We may have interacted together, but that interaction was often superficial. Modern digital communication may be no better in that regard, but likely no worse, and perhaps even better, when all is said and done.

At LawPundit, we previously quoted the famed novelist Thomas Wolfe on human isolation and loneliness:
"The whole conviction of my life now rests upon the belief that loneliness, far from being a rare and curious phenomenon, peculiar to myself and to a few other solitary men, is the central and inevitable fact of human existence".
Personal contact and digital communication serve as opportunities to come out of ourselves and to interact with the world around us.

The rest is up to us.

For this writer, the digital world has INCREASED our social community positively and substantially.

Although we do not doubt that others can have experienced this new world negatively, we are optimistic -- on balance -- that modern means of digital communication, as supplements to the tried and true alternatives of personal contact, are potentially welcome and useful additions to human life.

Indeed, we would suggest that is WHY they are so popular.


Hat tip to CaryGEE.

Crossposted from LawPundit.

Friday, April 13, 2012

Sunday, February 05, 2012

New Privacy Policy of Google May Run into Legal Snags in Europe and the USA


What this new Google privacy policy may mean in practice is that ALL your searches will become part of a single portfolio of information about YOU and be connected to all your Google accounts and services.  Hmmm.

Now THAT could be a very serious problem of "Big Brother" really watching us.

**********

For the USA, has the story at Google’s New Privacy Policy May Violate HIPAA, Congresswoman Says


For Europe, Ian Paul at PCWorld has the story in Will Europe Upend Google's New Privacy Plan?

As Paul writes:
"Google's new privacy policy brings together more than 60 privacy policies from various Google products into one document. The new policy enables Google to consolidate your personal information strewn about various Google services so that Google can treat you as a single user across all of its products. Google currently has more than 70 individual privacy policies covering all of its services."
We use Google a lot as our main search engine, as one of our chief email providers and also via our Blogger blogs, so that we see the eminent sense for Google of consolidating all serendipity things that one person does via Google into one consolidated account. Indeed, when we accessed Blogger today, we were alerted by a notice to the upcoming change in privacy policy. However, we see searches, email and blogging as three separate services.

Is simple notification of the new privacy policy sufficient to enable it?
Can one legally justify this kind of private data consolidation?
Indeed, is it enough to permit users to opt out of logging in to escape it?

What about the interests of the users? Should they not be able to decide on an application basis what information they want to share and with whom or not? We have no doubt, for example, that Facebook will be facing an uphill legal battle in the future because of its pervasive consolidation of user information. It is rather remarkable that Facebook has gotten as far as it has.

It is a classic clash of the interests of online providers of services vs. the individual privacy interests of its users, interests that the law must protect.

There is a limit beyond which privacy invasion is so pervasive that the government will have to step in and so, "this far, and no further". Clearly, we are reaching that limit.

Frankly, we think Google is going to have to backtrack on this decision in order to avoid massive user discontent.




The ISandIS Network

Our Websites and Blogs: 3D Printing and More 99 is not 100 Aabecis AK Photo Blog Ancient Egypt Weblog Ancient Signs (the book) Ancient World Blog AndisKaulins.com Anthropomorphic Design Archaeology Travel Photos (blog) Archaeology Travel Photos (Flickr) Archaeo Pundit Arts Pundit Astrology and Birth Baltic Coachman Bible Pundit Biotechnology Pundit Book Pundit Chronology of the Ancient World Computer Pundit DVD Pundit Easter Island Script Echolat edu.edu Einstein’s Voice Energy Environment and Climate Blog Etruscan Bronze Liver of Piacenza EU Laws EU Legal EU Pundit FaceBook Pundit Gadget Pundit Garden Pundit Golf Pundit Google Pundit Gourmet Pundit Hand Proof HousePundit Human Migrations Idea Pundit Illyrian Language Indus Valley Script Infinity One : The Secret of the First Disk (the game) Jostandis Journal Pundit Kaulins Genealogy Blog Kaulinsium Kiel & Kieler Latvian Blog LawPundit.com Law Pundit Blog LexiLine.com LexiLine Group Lexiline Journal Library Pundit Lingwhizt LinkedIn Literary Pundit Magnifichess Make it Music Maps and Cartography Megalithic World Megaliths Blog) Megaliths.net Minoan Culture Mutatis Mutandis Nanotech Pundit Nostratic Languages Official Pundit Phaistos Disc Pharaonic Hieroglyphs Photo Blog of the World Pinterest Prehistoric Art Pundit Private Wealth Blog PunditMania Quanticalian Quick to Travel Quill Pundit Road Pundit Shelfari SlideShare (akaulins) Sport Pundit Star Pundit Stars Stones and Scholars (blog) Stars Stones and Scholars (book) Stonehenge Pundit The Enchanted Glass Twitter Pundit UbiquitousPundit Vision of Change VoicePundit WatchPundit Wine Pundit Word Pundit xistmz YahooPundit zistmz